A Tin Fig, Given
Several times today I’ve removed my jacket while wearing earbuds. Some sort of static electrical charge is generated by the motion of my arms through the sleeves, and it goes right up the wires into my ears. Not a pleasant sensation; like the auditory version of chewing tinfoil on fillings. I wonder what the brain thinks of this. As I understand it, dreams come from the spurts of electricity generated during sleep; the brain gets all this juice, and tries to make sense of it by forming the jolts into plots and characters, grabbing whatever scenery and costumes are handy. Electricity from the outside just doesn’t have the same effect. Just as well, or there would be clubs where people hook up jumper-cable clips to their ears and have pedestrian visions in which they are late for a test for which they did not study.
I wonder if early humans in the cage had dreams that involved being unready for throwing a crude stone-tipped spear at a wooly mammoth. When I think of how the plots of my dreams use the innumerable details of modern life, I wonder what it was like to dream when you had very little raw material.
That vacation was a bad idea. Can’t get used to the idea of giving a single tin fig about anything, including the unlikelihood anyone would make a fig out of tin. But I use “fig” as a stand-in for the usual bit of scatology you find in that cliche. Or is it a metaphor? Or an axiom? I know it’s not a proverb. That’s one of the things that annoys me: when people say “I couldn’t give the proverbial tin fig,” or some such locution. Nine times out of ten there isn’t an proverb attached to the the figure of speech. Sometimes there’s an axiom, but no one ever says “I couldn’t give an axiomatic sauced gander,” or something like that.
I want to open a restaurant and serve Axiomatic Sauced Gander now.
Interesting: when you pinch someone’s butt, you goose them. When you look at it, you take a gander. Is the act of looking away leaving a gander? Well, as the axiom says, need a gander, take a ganger; have a gander, leave a gander.
No, I haven’t been hitting the Vicodin, but it’s tempting. I go back for the recapping of the tooth on Thursday; in the meantime, John Henry is driving the spike every time my teeth touch. I’m almost nervous to ask the dentist to recap the tooth, lest the camera swing over to that baldy campy guy in “Airplane.” “Well, first there was a gum, then there was some teething, and then the tooth came out, and then it was all happy until it got a cavity! And then it was sad, but Mr. Laughing Gas came along with his maaaagic balloon and everything was ducky.”
To continue our waterfowl theme.
One of those days where there just wasn’t enough celebrity idiocy to fill the blog beyond five posts. The Sheen schtick is thin and old, mostly because people are bored he doesn’t seem to be giving public displays of self-destruction on an hourly basis anymore. The moving finger writes, and having writ, moves on, but the dogs bark, as the proverb has it. No, wait. The camels, having writ, bark at the caravan. No no. The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on, that’s it.
Do I have that finger quote right? Le googling . . . not exactly. Hey, it’s Omar Shazaam, the guy who wrote “Desiperado,” that poem the Eagles based an album on. He also wrote the The Rubiat, and here’s the line:
Into this Universe, and why not knowing,
Nor whence, like Water willy-nilly flowing:
And out of it, as Wind along the Waste,
I know not whither, willy-nilly blowing.
The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.
Willy-nilly? Not once, but twice? Well, he was a mathematician first, and poet second. The only line I knew growing up was “A loaf of bread, a jug of wine, and thou.” He was a Sufi, or Dervish. (Yes, they whirled.)
I bought another software bundle yesterday, because I love getting lots of programs that possibly duplicate programs I have already, but have new icons. One programs renames files, something I use for pictures. Another monitors network activity and throws up warning signs any time a program wants to sneak outside for a smoke; another suspends programs that aren’t being used at the moment, but nevertheless consume processing power. There’s Parallels for quick dips into Windows, which I like. But I was intrigued by Civilization 4. Never played any of the Civ games, and was always intrigued. Why sure, I’d love to build a civilization. I like sim games, provided I can build what I want. The “game” part of the experience, for me, is design, not tweaking tax rates so I can generate enough money to build a train station. Boring.
So I loaded up the game, chose the “Roman” option, called myself Lilecus, and sat back for some civ-building fun. I was presented with a screen that showed one blocky jaggy warrior-guy standing with a flag. Off to the side: his twin. I clicked on him, and he grunted some form of Latin. I clicked on the other guy, and some space was highlighted with pieces of bread and gold. I clicked here and there. I clicked on buttons and got some option-overload menus. Had no idea what to do.
Deleted it.
At this point many Civ fans in the audience will be screaming no, no, it’s a great game! I have no doubt. Its fans are legion. But I could tell I had absolutely no time for this, and I just didn’t care.
This, however, is a different story.
This game I will play, even though it’s a console game.
Snow today: here’s another spiny floe that refuses to go down. I repeat: you brush up against these with a naked limb, and you bleed. They’re cactuses made of water.
This continues to interest me, year after year. It’s a holdover, a relic, something that once connected to the casual everyday use of classical motifs. Now nothing around it draws from the same source. But there it is.
Oh, man, I miss the novel. I’m sad it’s done. I start revisions next week, and will also return to #5 in the Mill City Quintet series. (Completion date: August 9. Mark my words.) If I’m serious about this series, this means I have to bang out 2, 3, and 4 in short order, which would be good if I’m serious about the self-publishing e-pub thing: people like series, and presenting the series in rapid succession would be a good thing. There’s also the pleasure of plotting out a five-book arc – AND including “Falling Up the Stairs” and its sequel as part of the cosmology of the stories. I mention this only because I’m standing at the kitchen island right now, around midnight, and this is when I usually write fiction; it seems odd not to making stuff up. Makes me itchy.
On the other hand: just got an email confirming a dinner coming up soon. Me and the guys from the Valli. All of whom are in the novel, and will be in the second and fourth. You can lament the dullness of the day, the grind, the drill, the duties, but there’s something wonderful to be said for getting together with friends and telling them they’re all in the book, and the book is good.
Writing the Valli novel was the smartest thing I’ve done this year. It refocussed everything. I am in possession of a big story. It has no vampires. There are no kings or werewolves. No mastermind capitalist behind the scenes pulls the strings. It’s not predicated on deep conspiracies that span decades.
New Comic Sins. Working on the Joe Ohio access issue; more tomorrow, and I appreciate your patience. See you naround!
68 Responses to A Tin Fig, Given
Recent Comments
- polymathamy on 06.14.12 Bleat
- Amanda from Michigan on Boo. Hiss
- Julie on Testing the new RSS feed idea
- shesnailie on Autobots and Bruckner
- Wagner von Drupen- Sachs on Autobots and Bruckner
140 or so
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Click – and SAVE!
A Book I Recommend
The Distant Past
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
Untold Riches Await You
This is just a fragment of the site, you know. Head HERE for the full menu. Enjoy!









Since we’re all airing our language peeves, “dock” is the waterbound area where your vessel sits when tied to the pier.
It is not possible to drag a “dock” from a lakeshore to use as a car ramp, no matter how poorly it intersects with the ground.
GardenStater – Ouch! You have hit me where it hurts. Folk etymology makes me nuts(ier). These little tidbits are typically made up out of whole cloth (don’t let’s start about that one) by tour guides and people who consider themselves good at figuring things out. Trouble is, they are almost never true. “Tinker’s damn” has been around since there have been itinerant fix-it guys. Before “tinker’s damn” there was “tinker’s curse”, which pretty well blows up the clay dam theory. You can look it up at phrasesdotorgdotuk. Not to put too fine a point on it, a tinker’s curse is meant to signify a thing of utter worthlessness – a tinker having even less influence in the way of damnation than the average person.
@hpoulter: Thanks for digging those up.
Seeing the other covers in that title makes me realize it was used to help sell Kenner toys, hence the TTP: Turbo Tower of Power logo.
Other cover logos include SSP: Super Sonic Power, which used a small rubber-tired flywheel to power toy vehicles at fast rates of speed (as opposed to the air pressure-driven TTP toys). I remember SSP well because I LOVED mine! A good hard yank on the toothed zipline put every ankle within a 50 yard radius at risk.
Sounds like Omar Shazam wrote most of the lyrics for the 1970′s Prog Rock bands.
@Kevin: I agree, it WAS a brilliantly written show. I especially liked the episode set on the Isle of Lucy.
My contribution for today’s conversation about regard given or not given comes from “Buckaroo Banzai.” A character indicated his disdain for an issue by stating he didn’t give a “flying handshake” about it.
Dream scenarios do change as we age. For fifty-odd years I frequently dreamed that I had to move with my parents to a state far away from my friends and all that I loved. After they were both gone, I still dreamed it, but in the dream I was able to say to my parents, “I don’t have to stay here, I’m going back home.” Someday I hope I’ll dream that I’m just helping them move.
And occasionally I still dream that I haven’t studied for the test, but then I say, “I don’t give a flying handshake about school anymore.”
what monster is eating all these tidbits on a tin fig?
swschrad on a tin fig
maharincess of franistan on a tin fig
you get the gist of it. I want to know when to run before I see the teeth and claws.
Most of my dreams are of the labyrinthine sort, not the unprepared-for-the-test sort. Since I tend to fly through most of life by the seat of someone’s pants (occasionally even my very own), there’s nothing unusual in being tested in a way I didn’t explicitly anticipate.
Didn’t “Axiomatic Sauced Gander” open for the Byrds at Woodstock?
I knew that someone–likely another Dave Barry fan–would beat me to a joke like that. (And to follow through, the band that played before them was Accepted Corn Principle from the comments to yesterday’s post.)
returning to the naming of novels…
how green was my valli?
“The Big Valli”
Valli Hai
Valli of the Zambonis
Uh-uh. Make it Valli of the Zamboni CHEERLEADERS
[...] In the interest of making finer adjustments, I set those later holes not quite a full inch apart. Still, I’m within a day or two of punching #11. I have no explanation for that, or for the fact that I’m evidently too damned cheap to buy a new belt. And perhaps I’m better off not knowing, or at least not giving an axiomatic sauced gander. [...]
Perhaps Our Genial Host was just being decorous, but ’round these hyar parts a goose is _not_ a pinch–it is when someone suddenly jams a finger/fingers up your exhaust port, in a move reminiscent of the accepted way of testing the freshness of poultry–say, a goose–, before the Age of Grocery Store Meat Departments. (For a full demonstration, see the ’70s R Lester/GM Fraser “Three Musketeers”.)
Which reminds me of when they tried to revive “Laugh-In” in the ’80s: the one episode I remember seeing had a running blackout gag of a strange waiter(Robin Williams, yet–the only cast member whose name I recall) never quite serving a couple in a French restaurant. The first was…
Waiter: [w/bad French accent] Would monsieur like to see thee wine list?
Man: Why, yes.
Waiter: [holds bottle out to couple, tilts it sharply] Le bon! [walks away]
Can’t remember the other two gags, except that they got progressively closer to physical damage to the couple, with the pay-off being the man saying to the woman, “Whatever you do, dear, _don’t_ order the Christmas goose!”
Don’t feel bad bgbear, I had never heard of Omar Khayyam until today…